↓ Skip to Main Content

Introduction to the New Statistics

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Blog
  • ESCI
    • ESCI in jamovi
    • ESCI on the Web
    • Dance of the Means
    • ESCI for ITNS
    • ESCI for UTNS
    • ESCI 2001 to 2010
  • Other Books
    • Understanding The New Statistics 2012
  • About Us
    • Get Involved
  • Get Started
Home › 2016 › August

Month: August 2016

Making pre-registration work

By Bob C-J Posted on August 28, 2016 Posted in Uncategorized No Comments

Here is link to the COMPARE project, an incredible, though depressing, project designed to check if clinical trials are following their preregistered analysis plans when published. Pre-registration is a great technique to help draw a bright line between planned and …

Making pre-registration work Read more »

Draw your own data tool

By Bob C-J Posted on August 22, 2016 Posted in Stats tools No Comments Tagged with descriptive statistics, Pearson's r, Statistics tools, visualization

Sometimes it is nice to be able to make up a set of data to explore.  Here is a cool tool that makes it easy to craft your own data set: just draw the data and you will instantly see …

Draw your own data tool Read more »

Criminal justice and the perils of regression analysis

By Bob C-J Posted on August 2, 2016 Posted in Uncategorized No Comments Tagged with Regression

Regression analysis is incredible–it can literally help us predict the future based on patterns observed in the past. There are many pitfalls, however, to using regression. First, the correlations observed in the past may not apply to new cases or …

Criminal justice and the perils of regression analysis Read more »

Recent Posts

  • Cohen’s d for the Paired Design: A Better Way to Find the Confidence Interval
  • What N Will Give Me the Precision I Want? Gordon’s New Pictures Tell All
  • Gordon Does It Again: See the Correlations Dance
  • WORLD STATISTICS DAY: “Connecting the world with data we can trust” (also, Open Science)
  • Goodies from Gordon: ‘distributions’, ‘d picture’, ‘correlation’–all part of ‘esci web’

Recent Comments

  • Geoff Cumming on Goodies from Gordon: ‘distributions’, ‘d picture’, ‘correlation’–all part of ‘esci web’
  • Joanna Meringoff on Goodies from Gordon: ‘distributions’, ‘d picture’, ‘correlation’–all part of ‘esci web’
  • LALEH on Cabbage? Open Science and cardiothoracic surgery
  • Bree on We’ve Been Here Before: The Replication Crisis over the Pygmalion Effect
  • Geoff Cumming on A Cliff at p=.05? Recent Evidence Suggests Yes

On Twitter

NewStatisticsFollow

NewStatistics
TheNewStatsNewStatistics@TheNewStats·
12 Apr

One year ago, eNeuro asked authors to include and emphasize estimates in all papers. Editors helped authors along.

Uptake is over 50%, science didn't break.

@eNeuroEiC takes stock: https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/2/ENEURO.0091-21.2021

Time for @SfNJournals @JNeurosci to jump in, too?

Reply on Twitter 1381645381482713089Retweet on Twitter 1381645381482713089Like on Twitter 13816453814827130895Twitter 1381645381482713089
TheNewStatsNewStatistics@TheNewStats·
8 Apr

New Stats blog: Cohen’s d for the Paired Design: A Better Way to Find the Confidence Interval https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/2021/04/08/cohens-d-for-the-paired-design-a-better-way-to-find-the-confidence-interval/

Reply on Twitter 1380013404098793472Retweet on Twitter 13800134040987934723Like on Twitter 138001340409879347230Twitter 1380013404098793472
TheNewStatsNewStatistics@TheNewStats·
4 Apr

Rumpelstiltskin science: spinning regression to the mean, high dropout, and noisy sample sizes into headline gold.

@GretchenReynold

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/31/well/move/seniors-memory-walking.html#click=https://t.co/aZUj0LZBBI

Reply on Twitter 1378711647024480259Retweet on Twitter 1378711647024480259Like on Twitter 13787116470244802594Twitter 1378711647024480259
TheNewStatsNewStatistics@TheNewStats·
29 Mar

Is there a word for so impressed by a study while also so sad to see the huge problems it reveals?

Memory research, and neuroscience in general, has got to do better.

Read this to better understand why.

natalie schroyens@NatSchroyens

Just published by #eNeuro @SfNJournals! Our Registered Report meta-analysis investigating publication bias in a subset of the memory reconsolidation literature @luyten_laura @TomRBeckers @SigSigwald Wim Van Den Noortgate @CLEPLeuven (1/5)

Reply on Twitter 1376587851408805895Retweet on Twitter 13765878514088058954Like on Twitter 13765878514088058957Twitter 1376587851408805895
Retweet on TwitterNewStatistics Retweeted
i_calinjagemanDr. Irina Calin-Jageman@i_calinjageman·
25 Mar

Congratulations to our Amazing Dominican University Slug Lab Alumi: 1 general surgery residency match, 1 grad school acceptance, 1 vet school 4th year white coat ceremony! And it is only Wednesday!

Reply on Twitter 1374894606450577409Retweet on Twitter 13748946064505774091Like on Twitter 13748946064505774094Twitter 1374894606450577409
Retweet on TwitterNewStatistics Retweeted
Lise_EliotLise Eliot@Lise_Eliot·
20 Mar

1/🧵 Tweetorial on our new paper, “Dump the Dimorphism: Comprehensive synthesis of brain studies finds few male-female differences beyond size.” (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763421000804). It's big (43K words, 616 refs) so I'll cut to the chase.

Reply on Twitter 1373315409475072001Retweet on Twitter 1373315409475072001524Like on Twitter 13733154094750720011147Twitter 1373315409475072001
Retweet on TwitterNewStatistics Retweeted
annemscheelAnne Scheel@annemscheel·
10 Mar

We* got terrific news this week: Our paper on positive results in RRs vs standard papers has been accepted at AMPPS!
Just updated the preprint to the final version: https://psyarxiv.com/p6e9c (analyses/results unchanged).

* still Twitter-less Mitchell Schijen, @lakens, and myself https://twitter.com/annemscheel/status/1225106059808903168

Anne Scheel@annemscheel

New preprint!
Mitchell Schijen, @lakens, and I compared the rate of "positive" results (i.e., confirmed hypotheses) in Registered Reports to a sample of standard (non-RR) papers in psychology.
We found a *very* large difference. Thread... 1/
https://psyarxiv.com/p6e9c 2

Reply on Twitter 1369676829402013697Retweet on Twitter 136967682940201369749Like on Twitter 1369676829402013697171Twitter 1369676829402013697
Retweet on TwitterNewStatistics Retweeted
krstoffrKristoffer Magnusson@krstoffr·
4 Mar

🚀New interactive post: "Understanding p-values through simulations"

It illustrates type I error and power through repeated sampling.

https://rpsychologist.com/pvalue

Reply on Twitter 1367386250362109952Retweet on Twitter 1367386250362109952505Like on Twitter 13673862503621099521943Twitter 1367386250362109952
TheNewStatsNewStatistics@TheNewStats·
2 Mar

This is an amazing project. Hats off to all involved.

Not being part of this is my biggest research regret. I elected to respect the wishes of a co-author who vehemently objected. Proof we need to work hard at what this project is doing: normalizing admitting mistakes.

Julia Rohrer@dingding_peng

Out now 🥳 We asked psychologists to tell us how they lost confidence in one of their *own* findings and you won't believe what happened next! Or maybe you will, full article here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620964106>

Reply on Twitter 1366793429263466497Retweet on Twitter 13667934292634664971Like on Twitter 136679342926346649710Twitter 1366793429263466497
Retweet on TwitterNewStatistics Retweeted
dingding_pengJulia Rohrer@dingding_peng·
2 Mar

Out now 🥳 We asked psychologists to tell us how they lost confidence in one of their *own* findings and you won't believe what happened next! Or maybe you will, full article here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620964106>

Reply on Twitter 1366680527395295235Retweet on Twitter 1366680527395295235188Like on Twitter 1366680527395295235589Twitter 1366680527395295235
Load More...

Archives

  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016

Categories

  • Applied research
  • ITNS
  • Meta-analysis
  • NHST
  • Open Science
  • Replication
  • Statistical graphics
  • Stats tools
  • Teaching
  • The New Statistics
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2021 Copyright 2016 by Geoff Cumming and Robert Calin-Jageman | Powered by Responsive Theme