↓ Skip to Main Content

Introduction to the New Statistics

Main Navigation

Home
Blog
ESCI
Other Books
- Understanding The New Statistics 2012
About Us
- Get Involved
Get Started

Home › 2020 › January

Month: January 2020

Bushfires and Open Science: A View From Australia

By Geoff Cumming Posted on January 9, 2020 Posted in Open Science, The New Statistics, Uncategorized No Comments

Our Family Summer in a Time of Fires We’re just back home after a couple of weeks at the big old family beach house. We had one stinking hot day, 40+ degrees, but, strangely, other days were cool to cold, …

Bushfires and Open Science: A View From Australia Read more »

Search for:

Recent Posts

What N Will Give Me the Precision I Want? Gordon’s New Pictures Tell All
Gordon Does It Again: See the Correlations Dance
WORLD STATISTICS DAY: “Connecting the world with data we can trust” (also, Open Science)
Goodies from Gordon: ‘distributions’, ‘d picture’, ‘correlation’–all part of ‘esci web’
“Which of the Books Should I Buy?”

Recent Comments

LALEH on Cabbage? Open Science and cardiothoracic surgery
Bree on We’ve Been Here Before: The Replication Crisis over the Pygmalion Effect
Geoff Cumming on A Cliff at p=.05? Recent Evidence Suggests Yes
Patrick Maclean on A Cliff at p=.05? Recent Evidence Suggests Yes
Keith O'Rourke on The Shape of a Confidence Interval: Cat’s Eye or Plausibility Picture, and What About Cliff?

On Twitter

NewStatisticsFollow

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

Is this the greatest article title ever?

Giving love (of fractal wood art) a (deservedly) bad name!

Reply on Twitter 1349185385692352513 Retweet on Twitter 1349185385692352513 Like on Twitter 13491853856923525133 Twitter 1349185385692352513

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

Some studies do replicate, including this interesting association between mathematical operations and body position (+ to the right, - to the left). Plus this paper has a detailed tutorial on a Bayesian analysis of a factorial design in JASP. Is +/right universal?

Tom Faulkenberry@tomfaulkenberry

Just posted to @PsyArXiv -- a new paper with my students Keelyn Brennan and Michaela Rutledge:

"Arithmetic operation signs elicit spatial associations: A confirmatory Bayesian analysis"

Link to preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/5je9u
Link to data/materials: https://osf.io/4sedf/

Reply on Twitter 1346560204066992130 Retweet on Twitter 13465602040669921301 Like on Twitter 13465602040669921302 Twitter 1346560204066992130

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

If you teach ugrad science, this paper has something for you: https://tinyurl.com/juliopaper

Though focused on neuroscience, it:
* summarizes research on good science pedagogy
* explains why good teaching alone is not enough to confront discrimination
* tells admin how to support us

Reply on Twitter 1339960798966378497 Retweet on Twitter 13399607989663784971 Like on Twitter 13399607989663784973 Twitter 1339960798966378497

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

Because everything that can happen in 2020 does happen, a squirrel joined my stats zoom yesterday (from a 2nd floor window!)

If my students remember one thing about this semester, it will now probably be this squirrel. Wish I had somehow connected it to a stats concept.

Reply on Twitter 1337073229224157187 Retweet on Twitter 1337073229224157187 Like on Twitter 133707322922415718716 Twitter 1337073229224157187

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

Dear rec letter portal developers:

Who approved adding the "end of knowing" date field?

Is this because I am writing letters from the afterlife? That would make sense, because it feels like I am in hell.

Reply on Twitter 1333965802886852609 Retweet on Twitter 1333965802886852609 Like on Twitter 13339658028868526093 Twitter 1333965802886852609

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

In the physical sciences, you never use a piece of equipment without knowing its measurement range.

Hilgard shows how to do this in psychology. With a "Maximal Positive Control" you max out your behavioral assay, providing valuable context for interpreting regular results. 👍

Joe Hilgard, that psych prof we all know and love.@JoeHilgard

Some effect sizes are way too big to be true. But how can you demonstrate that they are too big to be true? With the method demonstrated in my newest article!

https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1c7vD51f8ebXW#.X76DZfgFk5U.twitter

Reply on Twitter 1331710674632929281 Retweet on Twitter 13317106746329292812 Like on Twitter 13317106746329292819 Twitter 1331710674632929281

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

New Stats blog: What N Will Give Me the Precision I Want? Gordon’s New Pictures Tell All https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/2020/11/24/what-n-will-give-me-the-precision-i-want-gordons-new-pictures-tell-all/

Reply on Twitter 1331125786762506240 Retweet on Twitter 13311257867625062406 Like on Twitter 133112578676250624014 Twitter 1331125786762506240

Retweet on Twitter NewStatistics Retweeted

David Chester @daveschester·

Well-powered, preregistered tDCS studies rarely find effects. I've lost all faith in this stimulation modality for psychological and behavioral outcomes. https://twitter.com/hersenprofessor/status/1327614868137111552

Maarten 💉 Frens 🇪🇺@hersenprofessor

We find no effect of tDCS on cortical excitability in a pre-registered, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with repeated measures and sufficient power. Nor do we find evidence for so-called responders and non-responders https://www.brainstimjrnl.com/article/S1935-861X(20)30288-6/fulltext

Reply on Twitter 1327714130397114369 Retweet on Twitter 132771413039711436919 Like on Twitter 132771413039711436983 Twitter 1327714130397114369

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

What is forgetting? Is it decay of information, or just a temporary loss of access?

Today Irina and I published an experiment suggesting that forgetting is an access issue, at least for type of memory we studied. @SfNtweets

Paper: https://tinyurl.com/forgetpaper
Or thread: 1/13

Reply on Twitter 1327068873510817795 Retweet on Twitter 13270688735108177956 Like on Twitter 132706887351081779510 Twitter 1327068873510817795

NewStatistics @TheNewStats·

Have you checked out the esci module for jamovi yet? If so, you're not alone--looks like we've had about 1300 installs in October! If you haven't yet, check it out--you'll fall in love with jamovi and hopefully estimation as well.
https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/esci/jesci/
@jamovistats

Reply on Twitter 1326703061499326466 Retweet on Twitter 13267030614993264664 Like on Twitter 13267030614993264668 Twitter 1326703061499326466

Archives

Categories

Applied research
ITNS
Meta-analysis
NHST
Open Science
Replication
Statistical graphics
Stats tools
Teaching
The New Statistics
Uncategorized

Meta

Register
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

© 2021 Copyright 2016 by Geoff Cumming and Robert Calin-Jageman | Powered by Responsive Theme